In re Bellows
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire
[Certificate from the district court of the United States for the district of New Hampshire.] This was a case in bankruptcy, certified by the district judge to this court, under the bankrupt act of [August 19,] 1841, [5 Staff 442,] c. 9, for a final decision.
Read the full summary
[Certificate from the district court of the United States for the district of New Hampshire.] This was a case in bankruptcy, certified by the district judge to this court, under the bankrupt act of [August 19,] 1841, [5 Staff 442,] c. 9, for a final decision. The petition was as follows: “George Huntington, of Walpole, in the district of New Hampshire, and Hope La-throp of the same Walpole, respectfully represent: That the said George Huntington is the sheriff of the county of Cheshire, in said district, and that the said Hope Lathrop is one of his deputies. That on the 8th day of October,…
1Opinion of the Court
STORY, Circuit Justice.
It is not my intention to discuss the points involved in the first question adjourned into this court, in any manner whatever. So far as my judgment is concerned, they have been fully discussed, and fully decided by this court, in the former cases argued in Massachusetts. The attachment laws of New Hampshire differ from those of Massachusetts in no material respect — at least in no material respect affecting the present question. I consider the whole matter, therefore, settled in Ex parte Foster, [Case No. 4,960;] Parker v. Muggridge, [Id. 10,743.] In re Cook, [Id.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Stoddard v. LockeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
- In re Unit Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
- Graham v. BoyntonTexas Supreme Court · 1872
- Cotten v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1856
- E. Conery & Son v. WaggamanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.