Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided March 14, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
Through the procedure of submission of an agreed case, under KRS 418.020, various questions were presented to the Circuit court concerning the validity of certain procedures taken or proposed to be taken under KRS 76,240 to 76.280 to accomplish improvement of surface drainage in a particular area of Louisville and Jefferson County. The parties are the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District, the City of Louisville, the Jefferson County Fiscal Court, two property owners within the City of Louisville, and one property owner in Jefferson County outside…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- City of Louisville v. BitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Nevin v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Preston v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Alms v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- Kentucky River Auth. v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
- Greater cincinnati/northern Kentucky Apartment Association, Inc. v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Sanitation District No. 1 v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
- Woolsley v. Big Reedy Creek WatershedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.