Ordway-Saunders Co. v. Little
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
After Dawson Little withdrew as a partner from Ordway-Saunders Company and accepted payment computed under the partnership agreement for his partnership interest, he brought this action to recover additional sums for his share of partnership assets not included in the computation. Judgment was rendered decreeing his recovery of stipulated sums and the jury-found sum which were not included in the computation. We hold that the partnership agreement precluded the surcharges. Reversed and rendered.
Ordway-Saunders Company is, and for many years has been, a partnership engaged in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MercerTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Taormina v. CulicchiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Banker v. BreauxTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- Rice v. AngellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Padgett v. SteinbrecherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
- Medd v. MeddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Finn v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Finn v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983