Tidewater Railway Co. v. Shartzer
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Eoanoke county in a proceeding to condemn land. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Upon the motion of the Tidewater Eailway Company, the circuit court of the county of Eoanoke appointed commissioners to ascertain what would be a just compensation for “such part of the land, of the freehold whereof Jeremiah Shartzer is tenant, and for such other property as is proposed to be taken by the Tidewater Eailway Company, and to assess the damages, if any, resulting to the adjacent or other property of said tenant or owner, or to the property of any other person, beyond the peculiar benefits that will accrue to such properties,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. AyresIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hardy v. SimpsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Lambert v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- Stuhl v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Tidewater Construction Corp. v. ManlySupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.