Legal Opinion

Lambert v. City of Norfolk

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1908PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Norfolk iu an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought against the city of Norfolk to recover damages which the plaintiff alleges she had sustained in consequence of the city having established a cemetery adjacent to her lands.

It appears that on February 15, 1906, the city of Norfolk purchased, for cemetery purposes, a tract of land situated on Mason’s creek, in the county of Norfolk, two and one-half miles north of the present city limits, containing one hundred and sixty-six and one-half acres, at the price of $320 per acre, and has paid for the same and received a deed therefor. This purchase was made under power…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. HatchSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Chicago v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. Rea v. Tacoma Mausoleum Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Richmeade, L.P. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  4. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  5. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PR. WILL. v. Omni HomesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API