Legal Opinion

Fall River National Bank v. DeMarco

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 7, 1969No. 476-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is the defendants’ appeal from the entry of a summary judgment in a civil action on a promissory note.

The facts on which the action was brought are not in dispute. They establish that on October 28, 1965, plaintiff, hereinafter called “the bank,” loaned $5,000 to Russell Sportswear Mfg. Co., Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, of which defendant Anthony DeMarco was treasurer. This indebtedness was evidenced by a promissory note, payable six months from date, together with interest of $151.67. Significantly, collection costs or other legal charges were not included. Payment of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slefkin v. TarkomianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Marandola v. Hillcrest Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  3. Salvas v. JussaumeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Newport Plaza Associates, L.P., Debtor. Newport Plaza Associates, L.P. v. Durfee Attleboro BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Industrial National Bank v. PelosoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. Durfee v. NewportCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Durfee v. NewportCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Lutz v. Lutz Engineering Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API