Legal Opinion

Salvas v. Jussaume

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 14, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

In this action of assumpsit to recover money alleged to have been paid by plaintiff’s testatrix without consideration the court, on motion, directed a verdict for defendants at the close of plaintiff’s case during which two witnesses only were heard, to wit, plaintiff and defendant Albert called by plaintiff as a witness. The case is here on exception to the action of the trial court in directing the verdict.

The facts are not disputed. Plaintiff is executor of his mother’s will. The mother, Marie B. Salvas, prior to June 8, 1925, had worked. She was seventy-four years old and on various…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Whitehead Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Pryor v. StorkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Angel v. MurraySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  2. Hawkins v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Fall River National Bank v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API