Legal Opinion
Santanastasio v. Doe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant T.I. Transport, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated December 21, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, without prejudice to renew.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issue of fact from the case, and such showing must be made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Leal v. WolffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Barile v. LazzariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Island Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cortes v. WhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Hart v. Town of North CastleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Strauss v. BMW Financial Services Vehicle LeasingNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- Fruit & Vegetable Supreme, Inc. v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2010