Fruit & Vegetable Supreme, Inc. v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Kramer, J.
Has the defendant insurer satisfied its burden of proof that a policy exception applied to the damages sustained by plaintiff due to a blackout? This court holds that the defendant has met its burden of proof as to the damages sustained after the inception of the blackout, however as to any damages sustained prior to the blackout, summary judgment is denied.
Defendant The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance Co. moves for summary judgment. This action arises out of an “equipment breakdown” insurance policy issued by Hartford to plaintiff. On August…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Northville Industries Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Branham v. Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.