Legal Opinion

Feemster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1986No. 49387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Presiding Judge.

Movant, Raymond Feemster, appeals from the dismissal with prejudice of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.

Movant was convicted by a jury of three counts of assault in the first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 1978, and was sentenced to three consecutive terms of imprisonment of ten years each. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Feemster, 628 S.W.2d 367 (Mo.App.1982).

Movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion to vacate sentence. In the motion, he alleged that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tammons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. FeemsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Short v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Feemster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Stewart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API