Feemster v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Movant, Raymond Feemster, appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion. We affirm.
Movant was convicted by a jury of three counts of assault in the first degree. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Feemster, 628 S.W.2d 367 (Mo.App.1982).
Movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion. Counsel was appointed. The court dismissed the Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing, but did not make findings of fact and conclusions of law. On appeal, this court reversed and remanded, instructing the court to render findings of fact and conclusions of law.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Adail v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. FeemsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lindner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hogan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Sherrill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.