Clines v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtW. Sharp, J.
In this Anders appeal,1 Clines argues that, based on the undisputed material facts in the pleadings and probable cause affidavit, augmented by the police report, the crime of child abuse could not be established, pursuant to section 827.03(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1999). Thus, he was entitled to have his motion to dismiss the criminal charge granted. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.190(c)(4). All undisputed facts and *948inferences must be viewed most favorably to the state in such cases.2 We affirm.
Section 827.03(l)(b) defines “child abuse” as:
An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- MW v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- State v. FullerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zerbe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Burrows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Gouker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Jean Bernard Gelin v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Jean Bernard Gelin v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.