Legal Opinion

Witt v. Hartman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1970No. 8991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order quashing an alternative writ of mandamus by which ' respondent-appellee had been directed to approve a reimbursement voucher and issue warrants in payment of per diem and airplane fare covering petitioner-appellant’s out-of-state travel, or to show cause why he had not done so.

Appellant contends that appellee has a clear ministerial duty (i. e., the duty involves no discretion) to approve the reimbursement voucher and issue the warrants by virtue of § 11-1-9(E), N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp., for if that section attempts to place any discretion in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Synod of Ohio of United Lutheran Church in America v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Winston v. New Mexico State Police BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. State Board of FinanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State Ex Rel. McElroy v. VeselyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Lee v. HartmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brantley Farms v. Carlsbad Irrigation DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Mimbres Valley Irrigation Co. v. SalopekNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. City of Albuquerque v. RyonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Apodaca v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Johnson v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API