American Legion Holding Corp. v. Hurowitz
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
In November 1943 the defendants Philip Hurowitz and Rose Hurowitz leased certain property in the city of Vermillion. The lease was subsequently assigned by the lessor to the plaintiff in this action. The lease covered a term of three years from December 1, 1943 with the right of renewal for a “succeeding term”, and provides that the lessees “will use said premises as a store and for no other purpose whatever; and that they especially will not use said premises, nor permit the same to be used, for any unlawful business or purpose whatever, * * *”. There is the further provision in the lease as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Big Six Development Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Shepard v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Farwell v. EastonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Brookings Mall, Inc. v. Cpt. Ahab's, Ltd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Properties v. Hudson Oil Co. of United States, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. v. Building Leasing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mellgren Plumbing Shop v. Lewis and Tinsley, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.