Farwell v. Easton
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Barton Circuit Court. cited: Jeffries vs. McLean, 12 Mo. 538 ; Garnhart vs. Finney, 40 Mo. 449 ; Tayl. Land. & Ten. §§ 497, 498 ; Coon vs. Bricket, 1N. H. 163 ; Cowp. 803 ; Ware vs. Wade, 34 Cal. 145 ; Dawson vs. Coles, 16 Johns. 51. cit.ed: Wagn. Stat., ch. 61, § 39 ; ch. 85, §§ 10, 11 ; Tayl. Land, and Ten. p. 363, § 500 ; 1 Washb. R. P. 320 ; Lessee of. Sperry vs. Pond, 5 Ohio, 388.
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Judge
This was an action of unlawful detainer. In August, 1869, the plaintiff leased certain premises in Carthage, Jasper county, Missouri, to Paul E. Sandige, J. J. Hall and John Easton, trustees of Carthage Lodge number 201, of the Independent order of Good Templars, of the town of Carthage, for the period of one year. It was provided in the lease that the rent should be paid monthly in advance, and that for a failure to pay any instalment of rent for the period of ten days after the same became due, the lease was to become void. The lease contained a clause which forbade any underlease, except…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Big Six Development Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Gluck v. ElkanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- American Legion Holding Corp. v. HurowitzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Kraft v. WelchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Thos. Beck & Sons v. Economy Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.