Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 2018No. C–170231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

{¶ 1} Cedric Carter challenges the constitutionality of Ohio's death penalty statute arguing that imposition of the death penalty requires judicial fact finding in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial as set forth in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616 , 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). Carter is incorrect.

{¶ 2} Carter was charged with aggravated murder and aggravated robbery for the 1992 robbery and shooting-death of a United Dairy Farmer clerk, Frances Messinger. As required by the version of R.C. 2929.04(A) in effect in 1992, Carter's indictment included…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. BryanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API