State v. Carter
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
{¶ 1} Cedric Carter challenges the constitutionality of Ohio's death penalty statute arguing that imposition of the death penalty requires judicial fact finding in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial as set forth in Hurst v. Florida , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 616 , 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). Carter is incorrect.
{¶ 2} Carter was charged with aggravated murder and aggravated robbery for the 1992 robbery and shooting-death of a United Dairy Farmer clerk, Frances Messinger. As required by the version of R.C. 2929.04(A) in effect in 1992, Carter's indictment included…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MasonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BryanOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018