Legal Opinion

Conolly v. Schroeder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Gustav Schroeder and another, doing, business under the name of' Schroeder Brothers,' .from an order of the' Supreme Court, made at' the Yew York Special Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Yew York, on the 23d day of July, 1907, denying, the' defendants’' motion to. compel the plaintiffs to accept the answer theretofore, served by them.

1Opinion of the Court

Houghton, J.:; The verified complaint alleges that the defendants are indebted for l-ent. of .premises occupied by them and belonging to plaintiffs. The .answer denies any knowledges or information sufficient'to form a belief as to' the ownership of the premises and the institution, and prosecution of summary proceedings to dispossess defendants, and denies absolutely- the other- allegations of the complaint, and sets up by way of defense‘and counterclaim the leasing.of the premises from a former owner for a definite period at a stipulated rent, which was *635tendered to these plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paddock v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lassen v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. Finn Hannevig & Co. v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. Mathis v. BallardNew York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API