Legal Opinion

Antigo Electric Co. v. Faust Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWicichem, J.

Since 1882 the defendant Faust Lumber Company, hereafter referred to as the defendant, and its predecessors in title have owned and maintained, under authority of deeds and charter, a dam with an authorized seven-foot head across Spring brook, a small stream in the city of Antigo. Prior to 1923 the dam and pond were used by the defendant and its predecessors for power to operate its sawmill, also to harvest ice, and to float and store logs. By the fall of 1925 it had ceased its milling operations, removed its mills, and the property, though still maintained, was unproductive except for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Compact v. Kaukauna Water Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schlitz Realty Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Byrnes v. MetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API