Schlitz Realty Corp. v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The motion to dismiss the complaint for want of equity is equivalent to a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. We are therefore here concerned only with the allegations of the complaint. The question for determination is whether the complaint states a cause of action for injunctional relief.
It is the claim of. the plaintiff that the practices complained of as illegal go to the foundation of the taxation of its property and that under the rule of such cases as A. H. Stange Co. v. Merrill, 134 Wis. 514, 115 N. W. 115,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Judd v. Town of Fox LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- State ex rel. City of Sheboygan v. County Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Gilkey v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Foster v. RoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- A. H. Stange Co. v. City of MerrillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Eline's, Inc. v. Town of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Highlander Co. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Glenogle Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Direct Service Oil Co. v. Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.