Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1904No. 13,674PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; O. L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Atkinson, J. :

This action was instituted by W. W. Spencer against F. D. Taylor and J. W. Reeves to recover damages alleged to have been sustained on account of a failure to comply with the terms of a written contract. After a jury had been imxianeled and counsel for plaintiff had read to them the petition of plaintiff with the contract sued on, and made a statement of plaintiff’s claim, the court, upon motion of counsel for defendants, discharged the jury and rendered judgment for defendants for costs. Plaintiff brings error.

The following is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Hickey v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. E. G. Dailey Co. v. Clark Can Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Woodward v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Big Four Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Peoples Exchange Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Rogers v. White Sewing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Warren v. Ray County Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API