Legal Opinion
United States v. Kriesel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 29, 2007No. 06-30110PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
In 2004 we held that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 “satisfies the requirements of the Fourth Amendment” with respect to individuals on supervised release. United States v. Kincade, 379 F.3d 813, 839 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc). The 2000 Act required collection of DNA samples from individuals in custody and on probation, parole, or supervised release who had . been convicted of “qualifying Federal offenses,” then defined as certain violent crimes. 42 U.S.C. § 14135a (2000). Congress amended the Act in 2004 to expand the qualifying offenses to all…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Guzman-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.