Legal Opinion

Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1986No. EAB 84-AB-476; CA A31254; SC S32553PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This is an unemployment compensation case. The employer, Teledyne Wah Chang, sought judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) finding that claimants were entitled to unemployment benefits. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment Div., 77 Or App 148, 712 P2d 154 (1985). We affirm the Court of Appeals and EAB.

Claimants were employed by Teledyne Wah Chang at its Albany plant. In accordance with the collective bargaining agreement in force at the time, employer scheduled an “annual vacation shutdown” from August 13 to September 10, 1983.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. O'ConnorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. McKinney v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calef v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Calef v. Employment Dept.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API