Legal Opinion
Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 26, 1985No. 84-AB-476; CA A31254PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Employer seeks review of a decision by the Employment Appeals Board that claimants were unemployed and were not otherwise disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. We affirm.
Claimants are employed by Teledyne Wah Chang at its Albany plant and are represented there by the United Steel Workers of America. The collective bargaining agreement in force at the plant provided for an “annual vacation shutdown,” to be implemented at employer’s discretion. Employer implemented a shutdown from August 13 to September 10, 1983. The contract provided that at the time of a shutdown each employe was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Campbell Soup Co. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Skookum Co., Inc. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- McKinney v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Publishers Paper Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986