Legal Opinion

Crail v. Northwestern National Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 1984No. 83-271PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Harold and Darlene Crail, had been injured in an automobile accident and were paid $8,188.44 pursuant to the no fault provisions of an automobile policy issued to appellant’s employer by appellee, Northwestern National Insurance Co. Contrary to the terms of the policy, appellants were assured by appellee’s agent, James R. Ford Insurance Company, that they would not have to refund the money when they received an expected settlement from the tortfeasor. Relying on this assurance, appellants accepted and spent the money. When appellants received the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Gastroenterology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. McCuistion v. City of Siloam SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Williams v. CurtisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. Dixie Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. HammSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Babbitt v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. WayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Henry v. Gaines-Derden Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. First National Bank of Wynne v. HessCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Hot Stuff, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Special Insurance Services, Inc. v. AdamsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API