Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 2, 2011No. 100,233PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LUCICERT, J.:

In a pretrial ruling in this criminal case, the district court ruled that the defendant could not be charged with violating K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 65-4160(a), a drug severity level 4 felony, for possessing without a prescription a generic form of the prescription drug Lortab, a schedule III drug. The issue before us is whether the district court’s ruling was a judgment of acquittal, which is an order the State cannot appeal, or was an order of dismissal, which is an order the State can appeal. We conclude the order was an order of dismissal…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. Scott v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. GarzaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. LongstaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API