Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Harwood

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1979No. Civ. 9611, 9611-APublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

These are two appeals involving the divorce of Elizabeth and William Harwood. Elizabeth appeals from the judgment and argues that the property division is inequitable. William appeals from an order, apparently intended as a clarification of the judgment, entered eight days after Elizabeth’s appeal had been filed with the clerk of the district court. Elizabeth has moved that we dismiss William’s appeal.

The order that William has appealed from is, in effect, an amendment of the judgment after an appeal therefrom and, in part, relates to matters which occurred subsequent to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nastrom v. NastromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy United States v. Hudson Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Schmidt v. Plains Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Muraskin v. MuraskinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Wendel v. Domestic Seed & SupplySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API