Legal Opinion

Boylston Coal Co. v. Rautenbush

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1925No. Gen. No. 29,774PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

On July 6, 1923, the complainant, Boylston Coal Company, a corporation, filed a bill of complaint in the superior court for an injunction to prevent the defendants, David T. Rautenbush and Harold J. Crowe (whose proper name was Bernard H. Brahm), partners doing business as the Supreme Coal Company, from wrongfully appropriating certain confidential information of the complainant as a mail order coal dealer, which had been obtained by Rautenbush while an employee of the complainant.

The bill also prayed for an accounting for unfair trade. Rautenbush filed an answer and an amended answer, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Loven v. People ex rel. Dr. Peter Fahrney & Sons Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Witkowsky v. AffeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. John Davis & Co. v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Krueger v. LundeenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Gary Van Zeeland Talent, Inc. v. SandasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Armour & Co. v. United American Food Processors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Lincoln Towers Insurance Agency v. FarrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API