Legal Opinion

United States v. Crouch

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 8, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment against John G. Crouch for permitting a Chinese alien to land in and enter the United States, without necessity, and without giving bond under the rules and regulations of the Department of Commerce and Labor.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The defendant has demurred to an indictment brought under section 9 of the act of September 13, 1888 (25 Stat 478, c. 1015 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1312]), charging that upon the 2d day of December, 1909, at Brooklyn, within this district, the defendant was the master of a vessel, the Luristan, upon which one Ho Ling had been brought within the United States, as a member of the crew, who was at the time of landing a Chinese laborer and a person of Chinese descent and an alien and a person not lawfully entitled to land in and enter the United States, and that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Lee Ah Yin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  3. In re Ah KeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
  4. In re MoncanUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
  5. United States v. Chu CheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wong Hop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. United States v. CookDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API