Legal Opinion

Friedman?, LLP et al. v. Holmes et al.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 24, 2026No. 2:26-cv-03990Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Case No. 2:26-cv-03990-MRA-E Date September 24, 2026 Title Friedman?, LLP et al. v. Holmes et al. Present: The Honorable MONICA RAMIREZ ALMADANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Melissa H. Kunig None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND [10] Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (the “Motion”). ECF 10. The Court read and considered the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API