Legal Opinion
Hiller v. Ho-Chunk Gaming Commission
Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court
Decided July 5, 2000No. CV 99-72PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*277ORDER (Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment)
TODD R. MATHA, Associate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court must decide whether to uphold or reverse a licensing determination of the Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming Commission [hereinafter Gaming Commission]. The Court finds that the license revocation represents a reasonable civil penalty. The plaintiff forfeited her privilege to a gaming license by posing a potential risk to the public interest.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiff, Kerry A. Hiller, initiated the current action by filing a Complaint with the Court on September 22, 1999. Consequently, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gerhartz v. Ho-Chunk Nation Gaming CommissionHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2007