Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Witherspoon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Steven Witherspoon, was convicted at bench trial of simple assault. We reverse.

¶ 2 Witherspoon ran an amateur boxing camp for disadvantaged youth and made extensive use of volunteer trainers and assistants. Shortly after he enrolled his two sons in the program, Mark Saldivar, Sr. asked to volunteer and Witherspoon placed him in charge of supervising youths that were practicing their sparring skills. Soon after assuming his duties, however, Saldivar ridiculed a child for not following his instructions and Witherspoon pulled him from the task, suggesting that he did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. CuttsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. PollinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. DinkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moorehead v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Gorman v. BailDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. Altman, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Braswell, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Colon, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API