Commonwealth v. Cutts
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for aggravated assault 1 and recklessly endangering another person. 2 Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions.
In Commonwealth v. Herman, 271 Pa.Super. 145, 412 A.2d 617, we stated:
In testing the sufficiency of the Commonwealth’s evidence, we proceed in several steps. First, we accept as true all the evidence upon which the finder of fact could properly have reached its verdict. Next we give the Commonwealth the benefit of all reasonable inferences arising from that evidence. And finally, we ask…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FlaxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. CropperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. EberleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ButerbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Lewis v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Lewis v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Moorehead v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.