Legal Opinion
Lamborn v. Wm. M. Hardie Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1924No. 3927PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs below, plaintiffs in error here, were sugar brokers. Defendant was a large consumer. In the summer of 1920, plaintiffs sold to defendant 5,000 bags of Java sugar, at a stated price, deliverable f. o. b. ears Philadelphia. The contract did not fix the time of delivery, except as it provided that the sugar should be shipped during August or September by steamer from Java. A further provision was:
“Names of such steamer or steamers to be declared later. Should steamer or steamers declared against this contract fail to arrive at port of destination for any cause,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hendrick v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Imperator Realty Co. v. . TullNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Smiley v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Crary v. DyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Bay City v. Young's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- California Prune & Apricot Growers, Inc. v. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Matthew Smith Tea, Coffee & Grocery Co. v. LambornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- William M. Hardie Co. v. LambornCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926