Legal Opinion

Matthew Smith Tea, Coffee & Grocery Co. v. Lamborn

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 8, 1926No. Nos. 107-109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Lamborn sold Java sugars f. o. b. Philadelphia to many persons, and apparently exacted as many irrevocable credits covering payment to him for the same. When the sugars on the West Cheswald arrived, goods for which buyers were willing to pay 22 cents a pound at contráet date would fetch no more than 11 cents.

This fact does not affect the legal questions involved, but it does explain why consignments of sugar on the Chifuku, Washington, and Cheswald gave rise to a rather remarkable mass of litigation. Efforts to avoid accepting and/or paying for these sugars…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Lamborn v. Lake Shore Banking & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Williams Ice Cream Co. v. Chase National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. H. O. Wilbur & Sons, Inc. v. LambornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roberto Hernandez, Inc. v. Arnold Bernstein Schiffahrtsgesellschaft, M. B. H.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API