Legal Opinion

In re Lloyd

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1934No. 8283PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

The order of the referee is before this court for review on the certificate of the referee. Instead of certifying the question presented, as required by General Order 27 (11 USCA § 53), In re Kurtz (D. C.) 125 F. 992, the referee recommends that the petition for review be dismissed because it is “more a law brief than a petition” and because it is not filed by a party in interest but by an attorney representing the claimant.

The petition for review contains the necessary requisites, in that it includes a brief statement of the referee’s order, the errors complained of,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
Big Four Implement Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
In Re International Match CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
In re KurtzDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1903
In re Avlon Syrup Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

In re MarkhamDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966