Big Four Implement Co. v. Wright
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas; John C. Pollock, Judge. In the matter of one Bell, bankrupt; Isom Wright, trustee. The Big Four Implement Company and the Kansas Moline Plow Company appeal from orders denying their petitions for reclamation of property.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLARD, District ‘Judge.
In this controversy between the Big-Four Implement Company and the Kansas Moline Plow Company on the one hand,- and Wright, the trustee of Bell,’ the bankrupt, on the other, the court belo.w held that the appellants were not entitled to a return to them of certain farm implements received by the bankrupt on conditional sale contracts. The contract between the Plow Company and Bell was made on January 23, 1911, and filed in the proper register’s office on November 11, 1911. The contract between the Implement Company and Bell was made on December 8, 1910, and. was filed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bryant v. Swofford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- First Nat. Bank of Buchanan County v. ConnettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Rock Island Plow Co. v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carroll v. Cash MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. KemperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- H. W. Glessner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Marvin K. Dunagan, Bankrupt v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Bogdon v. FortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Malmo v. Washington Rendering & Fertilizing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.