Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1994No. 74943PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
In 1983 the parties were divorced in Oklahoma. The father was given custody of the children. The decree was silent as to child support. He then took his medical practice to Arkansas and the mother took hers to Texas. In 1989 the father filed a motion to modify in the District Court where the divorce was granted, seeking child support. The mother appeared specially and chai- lenged the court’s in personam jurisdiction over her, principally relying on 12 O.S.1981 § 1272.2 (now renumbered and found at 43 O.S.1991 § 104).
The District Court of Murray County sustained the mother’s…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Sullivan v. Forty-Second West Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- S.W. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Barker v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.