Ponti v. Farrell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiffs Joseph V. Ponti and F. L. Freeman brought this action against defendants David Farrell and Los Angeles Trust Deed and Mortgage Exchange, called Exchange. The complaint was in two counts. Count I was for damages for violation of the Corporate Securities Act. The court found against plaintiffs on that issue. Count II alleged ‘1 [w] ithin four ¿years last past and prior to the commencement of the above entitled action the defendants became indebted to the plaintiffs, and each of them, upon a written instrument in the sum of $5,000.00 for money had and received by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Firpo v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Pat Rose Associates v. CoombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Fabricon Products v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Creditors Collection Service v. CastaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.