Legal Opinion
Heinzelman v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 24, 2011No. 07-01 VPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD J. DAMICH, Judge.
Respondent filed a motion for review on January 6, 2011, of the Special Master’s Decision Awarding Damages dated December 7, 2010. Compensation in this case was awarded pursuant to the National Child Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l et seq. (2006) (“Vaccine Act”). The Special Master’s decision incorporated two previous rulings including the Special Master’s Ruling Granting Compensation, issued December 11, 2008, and Ruling Regarding Offset, issued May 18, 2010. In his Ruling Granting Compensation, the Special Master found that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heinzelman v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Moriarty Ex Rel. Moriarty v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Boatmon v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Forrest v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Goring v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.