Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Consolidated Sand & Stone Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1932No. File No. 7297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

The plaintiffs instituted an action against the defendant to recover damages to plaintiffs’ property located northeast of Sioux Falls and east of the Big Sioux river in Minnehaha county, S. D. It would seem that plaintiffs’ farm is well suited to raising crops, and that there is considerable evidence showing that it has good and fertile black soil, and that a portion of the land was being destroyed on account of the accumulation of gravel and sand thereon by reason of the flow of sandy water from defendant’s sand plant located on a hill to the east of plaintiffs’ real estate, where the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reagan v. McKibbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. White v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R'y Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bailey v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bates v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. First National Bank v. McCarthySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Consolidated Sand & Stone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API