Legal Opinion

Bates v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. File No. 5488PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURCH, C.

Plaintiffs, claiming to have rescinded their contract of purchase of certain Davison county land, bring this action to recover the earnest money paid thereon. Defendants in turn seek specific performance of the contract. The case was tried to' *604the court without a jury, decision and judgment were entered in favor of the defendants, denying recovery of the purchase money to the plaintiffs, and decreeing specific performance of the contract. From this judgment and from the order denying a motion for new trial, the plaintiffs have appealed.

[i] Appellants complain of the findings of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reagan v. McKibbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. First National Bank v. McCarthySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Peever Mercantile Co. v. State Mutual Fire Ass'n of CantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Murphy v. DafoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Breeden v. MartensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Larson v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Muhlhauser v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Alfson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Habeck v. HabeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wolken v. WadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API