Legal Opinion

Gust v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 1990No. 89-1218PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

558 So.2d 450 (1990)

Stephen Daniel GUST, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-1218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 28, 1990.

Stephen Daniel Gust, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

WILLIS, BEN C. (Ret.), Associate Juge.

In considering the State's motion for rehearing, it appears that there is some language which may be misleading and confusing. Desiring to clarify that which was intended, the said motion is hereby granted and the opinion now appearing in Gust v.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Colding v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API