Legal Opinion

Stern v. Does

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 10, 2011No. Case No. CV 09-01986 DMG (PLAx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUESTS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and Requests for Attorneys’ Fees. A hearing was held on January 28, 2011. Having duly considered the respective positions of the parties, as presented in their briefs and at oral argument, the Court now renders its decision. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motions and Requests are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff filed this action on March 24, 2009 and the operative…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Aldmyr Systems, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  3. Denison v. LarkinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. Durkin v. PlatzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  5. Monsarrat v. NEWMANDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API