Legal Opinion
Robeson Process Co. v. Robeson
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 26, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Robeson Process Company against Jacob S. Robeson and Jacob S. Robeson, Inc.
1Opinion of the Court
RUNYON, District Judge.
This suit is brought for infringement of patent, and is based upon two United States patents, No. 833,634, for process of treating waste sulfite liquor and compound obtained, and *71No. 1 069,029, for process of treating roads, etc. The acts charged by plaintiff as infringement are set forth in its bill of complaint as follows :
“And said defendants have further threatened within the district of Now Jersey to infringe said patents in suit, and each of them, by offering to supply and apply to roads within the state and district of New Jersey a lignin binder, which, in its…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Kokomo Fence MacHine Co. v. KitselmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Noonan v. Chester Park Athletic Club Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- American MacHinery Co. v. Everedy MacH. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- Werder v. Continental Can Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1937
- Robeson Process Co. v. RobesonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924