Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Collins

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1885PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis County, Stearns, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an action for damages caused by the negligence and unskilfulness of defendant as a physician and surgeon. It appears from the complaint, in substance, that defendant and one Graff were copartners as practising physicians and surgeons; that, plaintiff’s leg having been broken, he employed the firm to set it, and to care for and treat him professionally; that part of the time Graff attended him, and did his work skilfully; that the remainder of the time his partner, the defendant, attended the plaintiff, and performed bis duties negligently and unskilfully, causing the injuries…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walcott v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. City of East Grand Forks v. SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API