Legal Opinion
Montefusco v. Nassau County
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1999No. 9:96-cv-01893PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the motions of Defendants Michael Mostow (“Mostow”), Lindenhurst Union Free School District (“District”), and the Board of Education of Lindenhurst Union Free School District (“Board”) for summary judgment in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs John and Yolanda Montefusco (“Montefus-co”) oppose the motions. For the reasons discussed below, the motions are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff John Montefusco is a resident of Nassau County and has been a school…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Llerando-Phipps v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Higginbotham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Seils v. Rochester City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.