Schweid v. Storandt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Reargument of an appeal by the defendant, Carl W. Storandt, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Monroe on the 21st day of August, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the same day denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Robson, J.:
There is no controversy over the question of plaintiffs’ employment by defendant as real estate brokers to sell certain real estate owned by defendant, known as the Berlin Block, situate in the city of Rochester, 1ST. Y., and that if plaintiffs procured a purchaser for such property at the price of $50,000 the defendant would pay them as their commissions the sum of two and one-half per centum upon the purchase price. This is admitted by defendant’s answer. Plaintiffs further allege that they did in fact procure and produce a purchaser ready, willing and able to purchase said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Dotson v. MillikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walker and McClelland v. ChanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Hutchins & Co. v. ShermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Davis, Et Vir v. BattleSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Ford v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Ritchey v. MurpheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.