Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Shurkin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 10, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is to compel the defendant to perform his contract, in writing, with the complainants, to buy three adjoining apartment-houses in Newark. The defendant agreed to pay for them $67,000 by assuming a building and loan mortgage of $14,000 on each apartment-house, a second mortgage of $4,000 on each house, pay $9,000 in cash, and give his one-year bond for $4,000 for the balance, secured by a mortgage on the premises. The complainants did not at the time own the property, but had a contract to buy, and were to convey it to the defendant subject to the mortgages, which they were to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rucker v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Malkan v. HemmingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Welch v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Wirtz v. GuthrieNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
  2. Lach v. WeberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. Industrial Trust Co. v. CottamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1940
  4. WILLOW BROOK RECR. CENTER, INC. v. SelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API