Amburgey v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Judge.
James R. Amburgey was convicted of seduction and sentenced to confinement for one year. On appeal he urges that the crime of seduction cannot be committed upon a divorcee; that the trial court erred in the admission of testimony and in the instructions given to the jury; and that reversible error was committed by failing to have the grand jury proceedings reported.
KRS 436.010(1) provides:
“Any person who, under promise of marriage, seduces and has carnal knowledge of any female under twenty-one years of age, shall be confined in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Jennings v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Hoskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Evans v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bagby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968