Legal Opinion

Farley v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1891No. 14,747PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

— The board of commissioners of Hamilton county made an order in accordance with sections 2637 and 2638, R. S. 1881, directing that certain animals be allowed to pasture or run at large on the uninclosed lands or public commons within that county. The appellant filed with the auditor an affidavit of interest under section 5772, R. S. 1881, alleging the Dature of his interest, and that he was aggrieved by such order, and praying an appeal to the Ham*469ilton Circuit Court, tendered an appeal bond, with surety, which was approved by the auditor. The matter came on for hearing in the Hamilton…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Grusenmeyer v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hanna v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. O'Boyle v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Padgett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blue v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of Indianapolis v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API